Jakob GUTKNECHT - Bitter Pill

Worldcorruption.info

Masonic plot with the complicity of the State, at the service of "Brother" Claude BUDRY Content De nonciation   of   the   Inspector   of   the   criminal   police   VD   Daniel   KOLLY   and his partners in crime for abuse of authority as an organized gang Th e fire at Nonfoux VD on August 31, 2002 Th e  inconsistencies of the judiciary file 1.  The bullshit presented by KOLLY 2.  The cheatings of KOLLY become procedural truths Th e partners in crime of KOLLY Th e ascendancy of the Freemasonry in general and in the present case in particular 1.  My contacts with the Freemasons 2. The turnaround: the analysis of the scandalous affaire     of Jakob   3.  Omertà helvetica 4.  The conspiracy of the politicians Th e heinous crime covered by the Freemasons Ho w to cope with the hidden powers V. The ascendancy of the Freemasonry in general and in the present case in particular    1. My contacts with the Freemasons Certain   critics   explain   the   dysfunctioning   of   the   judiciary   apparatus   since   a   long   time exclusively   by   the   influence   of   the   Freemasonry.   Personally,   I   preserved   for   a   long time   a   more   nuanced   appreciation,   although   it   is   historically   proven   that   all   Vaudois who    had    succeeded    to    become    Federal    Councillors,    up    to    late    Jean-Pascal DELAMURAZ   had   made   it   with   the   help   of   their   membership   to   the   Freemasonry. This   applies   very   probably   for   other   key   positions   of   the   State   of   Vaud,   as   it   is   that one of the Attorney General. In   1990   a   friend   of   mine   wanted   to   recruit   me   for   his   masonic   lodge.   On   the   one   side, I   felt   flattered,   but   on   the   other   hand,   I   was   sceptical.   First,   I   wanted   to   know   more:   I got    an    invitation    to    participate    at    what    is    called    an    open    conference    of    the Freemasons   to   their   lodge   at   Beaulieu/Lausanne. A   former   French   Garde   des   Sceaux (Minister   of   Justice)   held   a   speech   about   the   capital   pain.   My   friend   commented   all the   time   through   the   evening   the   composition   of   the   audience.   Among   the   present persons,    there    were    plenty    of    Judges    and    Lawyers.    Their    apparent    arrogance, showing   up   during   the   very   lively   discussions   following   the   presentation   did   disgust me.   One   could   not   feel   the   slightest   devotion   to   the   ideal   of   Justice   or   for   the   public interest.   So   it   happened,   that   I   renounced   to   become   a   Freemason.   But   I   know perfectly that plenty of Vaudois Lawyers are members of this secrete association This   arrogance   of   the   Freemasons   is   reflecting   their   conviction   to   be   part   of   the   elite of the society, to be the illuminated. In   spite   of   all,   I   did   not   have   the   proof   that   the   Freemasonry   had   played   a   determining role   in   a   given   case.   One   can   suppose   that   the   Freemasonry   has   protected   one   of their   for   instance   in   the   affair   of   François   LÉGERET   (L’affaire      LÉGERET    –   Un assassin   imaginaire.   Jacques   SECRETAN,   Edition   Mon   Village   2016),   in   that   one   of the    surgeon        Gaston-François    MAILLARD     and    probably    even    in    that    one    of Skander   VOGT.   But   I   could   not   sustain   it   substantially.   However,   the   Freemasons attract themselves the permanent suspicions because of their secretive behaviour. I   got   to   know   as   well   Freemasons   who   had   become   themselves   judiciary   victims. Things   seemed   thus   not   to   be   as   clear   as   that.   Other   networks   of   cronyism   do   exist, for   instance   the   officers   of   the   Swiss   Army   or   simply   the   corporation   spirit   among Lawyers, eager to dominate the society as tyrants. 2.   The turnaround: the analysis of the scandalous affaire of       Jakob GUTKNECHT . During   a   long   time   I   maintained   that   80   %   of   the   judiciary   dysfunctioning   was   due   to silliness,   corruption   being   the   exception.   Still   when   writing   of   my   book   «The Album   of Dishonour»,   terminated   on August   30,   2016,   I   avoided   the   term   conspiracy,   stressing that we were rather faced with a generalized cronyism in the Canton of Vaud. One   has   permanently   be   aware   that   my   knowledge   of   what   is   going   on   within   the «Justice»   is   quite   limited.   Objectively,   I   know   just   the   peak   of   the   peak   of   the   Iceberg. It   is   perseverance   and   the   fact   to   have   systematically   collected   my   observations since   16   years,   which   let   me   today   present   a   new   appreciation   of   the   situation concerning   the   regime   in   power.   As   a   matter   of   fact,   if   I   had   avoided   the   word conspiracy,   used   to   speak   however   very   frequently   of   accomplices.   And   where   there are such partners in crime, their exists inevitably as well conspiracy.   Thereafter   I   am   going   to   convince   the   public   that   we   are   indeed   subject   to   a

BernLeaks

I

dictatorship of a hidden oligarchy The   affair   of   the   fire   at   the   hamlet   Nonfoux   on   the   territory   of   the   commune   of   Essertines-sur-Yverdon   of   August 31,   2002   bears   without   any   doubt   the   characteristics   of   a   freemasonic   conspiracy:   One   of   their   –   Claude   BUDRY, born in 1936 did benefit of a heinous crime on the back of a simple Farmer, Jakob GUTKNECHT, born in 1946. The   fact   that   the   quartet   FIAUX,   Daniel   KOLLY,   Christian   BUFFAT    and   Eric   ECKERT    have   dared   to   construct   a judiciary   crime   at   the   costs   of   GUTKNECHT   in   an   affair   where   his   innocence   was   well   established,   demonstrates how   these   individuals   feel   to   be   on   the   safe   side   to   be   covered   by   their   superiors.   In   this   case,   the   proof has been administered up to the European Court of Human Rights. The   long   term   cheaters   FIAUX   and   KOLLY    have   been   protected   by   the   Commanders   of   the   Gendaremerie   of Vaud,   Eric   LEHMANN    (left   for   an   anticipated   retirement   in   2009)   and   Jacques   ANTENEN    (the   present   boss). The   first   one   is   a   Freemason   from   Geneva,   and   ANTENEN   has   been   sponsored   by   the   Attorney   General   Eric COTTIER     and    the    State    Councillor    Jacqueline    DE    QUATTRO.     These    two    persons    are    both    presumed Freemason; their pupil ANTENEN must thus be it as well. Among   the   Freemason   Claude   BUDRY    a   crew   of   other   Freemasons   is   orbiting   :   When   he   solicited   the   civil responsibility     Insurance     Company     of     Jakob     GUTKNECHT     –     the     Zurich     insurances          ( see     dossier SCHNEIDER ) ,   the   selected   expert   to   determine   whether   this   appetite   was   justified   was   the   Freemason   architect Jean-Marc   LÉGERET    in   Vevey.   At   that   occasion,   this   LÉGERET   delivered   a   forged   attestation   according   to which BUDRY had rebuild an equivalent object to that one destroyed by fire.   See :  2006-07-11 Zurich Assurances . This   is   WRONG .   Before,   BUDRY   owned   an   old   farm   with   one   flat.   What   he   did   build   with   the   fraudulent   insurance allowances   resembles   rather   to   a   castle ,   containing   3   apartments.   Actually,   the   former   dwelling   had   not been   destroyed,   just   the   underroof.   It   had   been   already   dried   after   the   intervention   of   the   firefighters,   but BUD RY did manage cunningly to have it completely razed to the ground. This   man   used   the   cashed   in   allowances   from   the   ECA   not   only   to   replace   his   formerly   destroyed   dwelling   by   a replacement   of   equal   value,   but   to   have   constructed   3   flats,   the   whole   lot   conceived   by   the   freemason   architect Christian FERRARI  in Vevey. It   was   the   Director   of   the   Vaudois   Farmer   Union   Promoter,   Daniel   GAY    (a   presumed   Freemason)   who   did recommend   to   GUTKNECHT   the   fatal   choice   of   the   Freemason   Lawyer   Paul   MARVILLE .   This   one   has   betrayed his   client   in   advance.   For   preparing   the   trial   of   March   5,   2004   which   will   turn   the   destiny   of   his   customer   upside down, he invested just one short meeting  with GUTKNECHT... At   that   time,   the   Farmer   Georges   BURDET   from   URSINS   VD   (almost   a   neighbour   of   GUTKNECHT)   sat   in   the Board   of   Directors   of   the   Cantonal   Bank   of   Vaud    and   presided   the   supervisory   board   of   the   cantonal   fire insurance   ECA    –   a   Freemason.   It   would   be   surprising   that   the   innocence   of   GUTKNECHT   had   escaped   to   the knowledge   of   BURDET,   but   in   any   case,   he   did   undertake   strictly   nothing   to   prevent   the   amputation   of   the insurance allowances of the ECA at the costs of his Farmer colleague. We   find   15   Vaudois   cantonal   «   Judges   »   in   this   conspiracy.   My   present   knowledge   permits   to   me   to   designate only   4   of   them   to   be   presumed   Freemasons.   This   concerns   François   JOMINI   (Venerable   of   the   Lodge Alpina),     Bertrand   SAUTEREL ,   Pierre-Henri   WINZAP    and   the   President   of   the   cantonal   court   Jean   François   MEYLAN . However,   I   can   confirm   that   13   out   of   these   15   cantonal   «Juges»   have   covered   the   corruption   in   other   affairs. This    applies    to    François    JOMINI,     Blaise    BATTISTOLO ,    Jean-Luc    COLOMBINI ,    Lau rent    DE    MESTRAL , Bernard    ABRECHT ,    François    DE    MONTMOLLIN ,    Jean-François    MEYLAN ,    Joël    KRIEGER ,    Bertrand SAUTEREL , Pierre HACK , Fabienne BYRDE , Pierre-Henri WINZAP  and Philippe COLELOUGH . In   the   present   case,   «   only   »   3   federal   «   Juges   »   did   support   this   corruption   affair   :   Hans   MATHYS ,   Laura JACQUEMOUD-ROSSARI    et   Christian   DENYS .   Sure,   up   to   date,   I   classified   them   in   the   category   of   the   «useful idiots»   at   the   Federal   Court,   or   even   to   be   demential. Alas,   all   three   of   them   have   covered   already   in   other   affairs the corruption. Here   I   come   back   to   the   scandal   of   the   corrupted   and   fraudulent   federal      «   Judge   »   Roland   Max   SCHNEIDER . He   is   the   only   Swiss   Judge   whose   corruption   can   be   demonstrated   by   documents.   All   federal   «Judges»   have been   informed   about   this   fact.   None   did   let   fall   SCHNEIDER.   The   Dark   room   of   the   Nation    (the   triangle   Office of   the   federal   investigating   Judges,   the   federal   Prosecutors’   Office   and   the   Federal   Penal   Court)   did prefer   to   protect   this   criminal,   as   did   the Attorney   General   of   the   Confederation   Michael   LAUBER .   See   my letter   addressed   to   him   on   June   3,   2016    remained   without   reply.   LAUBER   did   neither   react   to   the   mail   of Johann GUTKNECHT, brother of Jakob. 2016-08-27 Gutknecht Lauber . The   inertia   of   the   federal   judiciary   instances   does   have   only   one   possible   explanation:   the   hidden   power   has ordered   the   leaden   shroud    to   cover   certain   affairs,   as   that   one   of   Jakob   GUTKNECHT   and   the   one   concerning the venality of the federal « Judge » SCHNEIDER Omertà helvetica An   insider   did   let   know   that   the   scandal   of   the   victim   Jakob   GUTKNECHT   is   taking   since   years   much space   in   the   debates   of   the   Vaudois   Freemasons,   whereas   this   object   has   hardly   found   an   echo   in   the Mass   Media…   Apart   two   articles   in   the   Newspaper   Vigousse    of   June   22,   2012   and   september   12,   2014 ,    this scandal   has   not   been   reported   by   any   other   Newspaper   of   the   country.   This   will   not   surprise   the   thousands   of Swiss   judiciary   victims,   having   undergone   the   same   experience:   The   Mass   Media   refused   to   speak   about   their experience. This   phenomenon   as   well   does   have   only   one   explanation:   a   hidden   oligarchy,   being   extremely   powerful   orders this   omertà   helvetica.   My   letter   to   the   supreme   censor   of   the   SWISS   State   Radio/Television,   Roger   DE   WECK du   05   septembre   2016    demonstrates   that   this   censorship   is   wanted   among   others   as   well   by   Members   of the   federal   Parliaments.    The   journalists,   afraid   to   risk   their   jobs,   are   applying   auto-censorship.   For   saving   the face,   they   advance   excuses   –   that   these   affairs   were   to   complex,   or   presently   not   of   actual   interest   etc. Anyway, they cannot admit that they shut up because of cowardice. All   together   this   censorship   is   moulded   in   concrete   with   the   censorship   of   the   Web.   For   many   years,   the   Vaudois «   Prosecutor   »      Yves   NICOLET    (promoted   to   the   position   of   federal   «Prosecutor»)   did    censor   the   Internet sites    of   their   critics   Marc-Etienne   BURDET   and   Gerhard   ULRICH   by   illegal   and   secrete   orders,   supported   in   his efforts   by   the   cantonal   Judges,   the Attorney   General   VD   Eric   COTTIER    and   the   federal   «Judges»,   because   they also   were   interested   to   suffocate   critics   concerning   them.   Since   October   5,   2016   his   successor   Stéphane COLETTA  is exercising the illegal censorship finally by orders sent to the concerned parties. I   unveiled   this   described   censorship,   its   mechanism   and   amplitude   to   some   200   journalists.   There   was   no feedback   in   the   Mass   Media   !   We   are   faced   with   the   fact   that   the   Swiss   population   is   censored,   that   is   to   say permanently   manipulated   by   a   hidden   power   to   an   extent   which   may   get   jealous   the   dictator   of   North   Korea   Kim JONG-UN. The irony of this success is that the inhabitants of this country ignore it blissfully… The   hidden   oligarchy,   that   is   to   say   the   Freemasonry   with   its   attached   service   clubs   need   to   avoid   any transparency for conserving their power. The conspiracy of the politicians We   have   seen   above   that   the   President   of   the   State   Council   VD,   Pierre-Yves   MAILLARD    (socialist)   and   his government   colleague,   responsible   for   the   institutions   and   the   security,   Béatrice   MÉTRAUX    (the   Greens)   tolerate the   judiciary   crime.   The   reason   is   that   they   are   Freemasons.   The   3   representatives   of   the   PLR   party   (les libéraux/radicaux)   in   the   State   Council   are   as   well   immune.   The   most   dangerous   one   among   them   is   perhaps Philippe   LEUBA   (Zofingers   and   ROTARY) .   The   petty   contractor   Gil   BEURET/La   Fourmi   is   telling   how   he   was threatened by this individual in the context of his conflict with the Vaudois Mafia. Pascale   BROULIS   has   been   informed   repeatedly   about   the   fiscal   irregularities   of   the   real   estate   tycoon   Patrice GALLAND .   In   the   interest   of   the   State,   he   should   have   acted.   He   remained   mute.   Vaudois   socialist   Members   of Parliament   explain   this   inaction   by   the   interest   of   the   radical   party   to   get   hidden   financings   –   GALLAND   is probably a generous donator to the PLR, yielding in turn financial indulgence. The   President   of   the   government,   Pierre   Yves   MAILLARD,   a   socialist   and   Freemason   brother   is   closing   his   eyes, benefiting of arrangements in favour of his customer base. The   radical   State   Councillor   Jacqueline   DE   QUATTRO    is   not   only   Freemason   but   as   well   a   Lawyer   and   as   such very   well   informed   about   the   dysfunctioning   of   the   judiciary   apparatus.   Never   one   has   heard   her   to   pronounce   the slightest criticism from her end. And   the   remaining   two   Members   of   the   governing   collegium?      Nuria   GORRITE   (socialist)   is   irradiated   by   her intimate relationship with the Freemason Olivier FELLER  (radical national Councillor). Anne-Catherine   LYON   has   just   been   expelled   by   mobbing.   Obviously,   she   is   not   supported   within   the   hidden oligarchy. The   succession   of   Mrs.   LYON   triggered   of   the   ambitions   of   candidates   which   may   as   well   be   considered   as presumed Freemasons : -  For electing the corrupted Freemason Bertrand SAUTEREL  (PLR) to the position of a cantonal Judge,    the socialist Fabienne FREYMOND CANTONE  presented him on May 13, 2008 as « responding best    to the criteria of selection, such as intellectual honesty » . Today, FREYMOND CANTONE estimates    that the hidden oligarchy owns her in turn to be elected government member. -  On April 30, 2016 I dispatched to all Members of Parliament VD a petition, containing a description of    judiciary dysfunction. By mail of May 19, 2016 the President of that Parliament, the socialist    Roxane MEYER KELLER  did short cut this action, declaring it inadmissible because of « inconvenient    terms ». She feels as well to have earned the merits of her sisters and brothers to get installed on the    perch of power -  The petty contractor Gil BEURET/La Fourmi had submitted his file to Isabelle CHEVALLEY  (national    Councillor, green-liberal). This Lady returned the documents with the statement, not to have discovered    any irregularities. CHEVALLEY is thinking that so much blindness in favour of the « Cosa nostra    vaudoise » shall bring her a promotion in turn. -  Jacques NICOLET  ( UDC ) did benefit in the past already by the support of the Freemasons, since he    has been President of the Vaudois Parliament in 2014. When his farm burned down, the ECA assumed    the full allowances, without making much fuss. It seems that the villagers of Lignerolle VD all had    smelled the odours of hay fermentation. NICOLET feels thus as well to be strongly supported by    his brothers. -  The other UDC , the mayor of Baulmes, Julien CUÉREL has a rather modest intellectual level; his    blind loyalty to the judiciary apparatus makes him to be suspected to be a Freemason. In any case, he    feels to be worthy to be elected to the position as State Councillor. For   what   is   concerning   the   situation   on   the   national   level,   I   reserve   that   chapter   to   a   future   publication,   to   deal with it in more detail VI. The heinous crime covered by the Freemasons For sure, the fire has not been caused by a hay fermentation. Therefore, one has to search elsewhere. The    only    serious    verifications    carried    out    in    this    case    by    the    investigators,    with    the    aim    to    charge    Jakob GUTKNECHT   were   those   for   excluding   that   a   lightening   or   an   electric   short   cut   had   caused   the   sinister.   But   on the   other   side,   KOLLY   and   his   partners   in   crime   did   mislead   the   inquiry,   ignoring   the   statements   of   Jakob GUTKNECHT   to   have   seen   the   start   of   the   fire   in   the   aeration   channel   of   the   cow   house,   and   the   witnesses speaking of a detonation. The heinous crime was thus excluded ex officio. Who did benefit of the crime ? Johann   GUTKNECHT,   the   brother   of      Jakob   has   made   the   calculation   that   Claude   BUDRY   benefited   of total insurance allowances of CHF 2'103'685.10. See Decompte_escroquerie. Jakob   GUTKNECHT   did   indicate   that   Claude   BUDRY   had   drilled   3   days   prior   to   the   fire   through   the   firewall separating   his   farming   facilities   with   that   one   of   BUDRY.   This   had   happened   during   the   evening   milking   of   the cows   on   Wednesday,   28   of August   2002.   Two   drilling   holes   ended   in   the   aeration   channel   on   the   floor   above   the cow   house   ….   The   third   whole   was   situated   about   3   m   to   the   West   at   the   same   level.   These   holes   on   the   side   of that channel are well visible on the photograph below . The   expertise   LAVOUÉ   discusses   the   probability   of   a   heinous   crime   on the pages   14   -16   –   See   :   2010-10-19   Expertise   Lavoué ,   with   a   photograph   as an   evidence.   LAVOUÉ   remarks   the   heat   impact   of   the   so   called   clean   burn (The   great   heat   of   an   explosion   of   a   hydrocarbon   is   consuming   the   black soot,   and   leaves   white   spots   as   shown   on   that   picture.)   at   the   place   where Jakob GUTKNECHT had discovered the start of the fire. Feeling   the   partiality   of   the   investigators,   GUTKNECHT   did   not   dear   to   speak outright   of   his   suspicions.   He   thought   it   to   be   more   appropriate   to   push   the inspectors   of   the   criminal   Police   in   the   right   direction,   by   guiding   them   with concrete   hints,   for   offering   them   the   opportunity   to   discover   themselves   the truth.   However,   they   remained   deaf.   One   answered   to   him   that   h is   explanations   were childish,   that   one   investigated   nowadays   with   modern   methods   etc.   Or,   GUTKNECHT was   told   directly   that   the   investigators   had   the   order   just   to   prove   that   the fermentation of the hay had provoked the fire. T h e   photogragphy   on   the   links,   was   picture   shot   by   a   villager,   proving   that the   first   smoke   has   been   black.   This   black   smoke   at   the   start   of   the   fire, signify    that    this    color    of    smoke    may    be    due    to    the    combustion    of    a hydrocarbon    (page    14    expertise    LAVOUÉ).    BUDRY    took    care    that    the original picture has disappeared, bud good quality copies were preserved. It   is   also   explained   on   page   12   of   the   same   expertise,   «   that   the   fodder must   reach   a   temperature   higher   than   250   °   C   to   have   a   risk   of   self ignition.   At   this   temperature   the   barn   would   have   been   a   furnace   and the   occupant   and   the   animals   would   necessarily   have   felt   an   abnormal heat » . Moreover,   Jakob   GUTKNECHT   had   reported   having   checked   the   temperatures   of   his   boots   until   approximately one week before the occurrence of the fire. He had measured values below 33 ° C. After   the   fire,   Jakob   GUTKNECHT   had   informed   his   observations   to   experts   of   the   EPFL,   the   scientist   Dr   Marcos RUBINSTEIN   and   Dr   Rachidi   MAÎTRE.   These   scientists   were   willing   to   be   mandated   for   inspecting   the   place   of the crime. Evidence : 2006-04-12 EPFL . But    Jacques   ANTENEN     (at    that    time    leading    cantonal    investigating    Judge)    did    not    permit    them    to intervene.   For   those   specialists,   the   origin   of   the   sinister   was   no   secret,   since   they   did   ask   the   right questions to GUTKNECHT. Jakob   GUTKNECHT   did   as   well   some   search   afterwards   on   the   spot   whe re   the fire    had    originated.    Beneath    the    separate    hole    at    ground    level,    he    found unburned   straw,   covering   rubble.   In   this   material,   he   found   a   suspicious   small metallic   device.   Having   been   trained   in   the   Army   as   a   minor   sapper,   he   was   sure   to have   discovered   the   detonator.   This   whole   served   by   the   way   according   to   his   opinion to have the fire spreading into the facilities of BUDRY across the separating firewall. The   GUTKNECHT   family   sent   the   presumed   detonator   (photograph   see   below)   to   the Laboratoire   Central   de   la   Préfecture   de   Police   (LCPP),   Département   Déminage   et Interventions   in   Paris.   They   committed   the   carelessness   to   provide   too   many   details about    their    case.    One    has    to    know    that    the    Police    services    of    the    European    countries    are    extensively communicating   among   themselves. Anyway,   a   man   named   Daniel   LAMIRAUX   of   the   LCCP   did   conclude   in April 13,   2007   that   it   «seems   to   be   quit   unlikely   that   that   dispositive   was   at   the   origin   of   the   fire».   He   missed   to   specify, for   what   other   purposes   this   object   had   served.   One   sees   that   the   Freemasonry   has   long   arms.   For   them, national borders do not exist. This    in    combination    with    the    witnesses    speaking    of    a    detonation,    the    observed    black    smoke    (as    when hydrocarbon   provokes   an   outbreak   of   fire)   does   leave   no   room   for   hazard:   there   was   heinous   crime,   covered   by the Freemasons for favouring on of their, at the costs of the Farmer Jakob GUTKNECHT. Since   the   cheaters   KOLLY   and   associates   had   omitted   to   submit   the   place   where   the   fire   had   started   to   a chemical   examination,   for   proving   that   a   hydrocarbon   had   been   applied   for   triggering   off   the   fire,   it   may   be   difficult to convict formally the guilty man of this heinous crime 14 years later. Today,   the   health   of   Jakob   GUTKNECHT   is   ruined.   For   saving   his   livestock,   his   lungs   have   suffered   irremediable damages   because   of   smoke   intoxication.   His   heart   is   sick.   He   is   living   in   a   state   of   poverty,   which   cannot   be imagined by our contemporanean fellow citizens. The judiciary crime suffered by GUTKNECHT is the job of a Freemasonry conspiracy. Suddenly,   I   understood   that   plenty   of   judiciary   dysfunctions   are   the   result   of   actions   of   this   hidden oligarchy ! They dear ! Unscrupulously ! VII. How to cope with the hidden powers ? The   citizen   who   has   not   experienced   the   cheatings   of   the   powers   of   this   country   has   difficulties   to   believe   their existence.   Switzerland   offers   to   the   average   inhabitant   an   unprecedented   wealthy   environment.   However,   our dear   fellow   citizens   are   ill   informed   to   think   to   be   beyond   the   risk   to   go   through   the   judiciary   mill   one   day. According   to   my   prudent   estimations,   this   country   is   producing   presently   at   least   6'000   judiciary   victims   a   year   be it   80   x   6'000   =   480'000   accumulated   victims   during   the   actual   average   life   span   of   a   person   (80   years).   Tendency clearly   increasing.   This   number   is   thus   representing   more   than   5   %   of   the   inhabitants,   with   the   hypothesis   that the   population   and   the   dysfunctioning   would   stagnate.   Expressed   otherwise,   1inhabitant   out   of   20   is   risking   to   be snapped up to a varying degree going from an unjustified fine up to an unjustified jailing during his life. Evidently,   those   who   have   already   been   scrapped   by   the   packed   machine   are   thinking   the   most   strongly   about means   to   prevent   those   human   disasters.   Myself,   I   am   not   very   fund   of   the   production   of   new   laws,   being   of   the opinion,   that   one   can   live   quite   well   with   the   existing   laws,   that   is   to   say   to   have   the   judiciary   power   submitted   to   a survey from the outside by non-Lawyers, watching that the existing laws are really administered. Other   victims   think   that   one   has   to   change   the   laws.   The   petty   contractor   Gil   BEURET,   victim   of   the   hidden oligarchy of Vaud and presently imprisoned is suggesting to create federal legislation, prescribing : - the prohibition to sit in on boards of directors of private societies as soon as being elected to a position   equivalent to a municipal or other  executive, as well as the prohibition to be nominated to a position of   a State agency; - the prohibition of societies and foundations with mixed capitals (State/ private societies); - the obligation of the elected politicians and of the judiciary Magistrates to unveil their membership   to secret societies, such as the Freemasons, the service clubs as the Rotary, Lions Club, Kiwanis,   the Zofingers, etc.* - the transparency of financing of the political parties The    combination    of    the    two    approaches    –    control    of    the    Magistrates    from    the    outside    +    new    appropriate legislation is compatible for stopping the present hecatomb. * Advice of Michèle HERZOG : The transparency concerning the links with the Freemasonry and the Service Clubs should be compulsory : • for all Prosecutors, Judges, but as well all judiciary experts. • for the Lawyers and Notaries. • for all government employees. • for all politicians. • and for all persons implied in a trial. The   citizens   should   be   facilitated   to   know   rapidly   if   such   Lawyer,   such   Notary,   such   expert,   such   Magistrate,   such government   employee,   such   politician   is   Freemason,   and   to   which   Service   Club   he   is   belonging. And   this   should be released before the elections or at the beginning of a judiciary or administrative procedure.   This   transparency   shall   be   retro-active   for   20   years,   for   understanding,   in   which   cases   the   Freemasons   had interfered in an organized manner. Marc-Etienne BURDET presented his ideas in a request addressed to the Federal Council of May  23, 2015 www.worldcorruption.info/index_htm_files/fm_55_23-05-2015.pdf

1st Part

Deutsch

Français

1st Part

Deutsch

Français

Jakob GUTKNECHT Victim of a vicious crime, He was convicted to cover abuses of authority by public servants involved in organized crime With the guarantee of the State

UPLOAD « Bitter Pill for the Freemasons »