The   Clearstream   affair   is   the   name   of   two   cases   concerning   the   Luxembourg   clearing   house   Clearstream,   since   2002,   a division of DEUTSCHE BÖRSE.  (Extracts from Wikipedia: Clearstream Affair) The Clearstream affair 1 (2001-2003) Consisted   of   a   survey   of   Clearstream   to   verify   the   facts   reported   in   2001   -   2002   by   journalist   Denis   ROBERT   in   his   book   Revelation $   and   The   Black   Box   :   the   possible   use   of   unpublished   accounts   system   of   the   clearing   house   for   money   laundering.   (Fraud   and laundering hundreds of billions of FERRAYE royalties) The Clearstream affair 2 (2004-2011) Consisted   of   a   manipulation   of   justice   by   a   small   group   of   politicians   and   industrialists,   to   involve   in   the   Taiwan   frigates   scandal   innocent persons   in   order   to   evict   them.   (The   "innocent"   persons   in   question   were   largely   French   Ministers   and   other   senior   officials   of   the   French government with ties to the FERRAYE case and maybe not so "innocent" than that! CEDEL International Before    taking    the    name    of    CLEARSTREAM     in    2001    following    the    merger    with    DEUTSCHE    BÖRSE,    the    company    then    100% Luxembourger,   was   called   CEDEL   International   and   had   a   branch   in   Geneva    with   the   Registration   number   CH   660.1.615.000-4.   Of course,   by   saying   that   "discretion   of   measures",   the   Swiss   federal   authorities   have   removed   some   names   from   the   register   of   the aforementioned   trade,   but   the   excerpt   available   HERE    (not   exhaustive),   still   allows   to   have   an   idea   of   the   relationship   between   CEDEL International Geneva and other companies controlled by the French Government or banks involved. Until   2001,   CEDEL   International   was   chaired   by   the   Swiss André   Lussi   dismissed   and   convicted   for   misuse   of company   property,   forgery   and   use. A   report   by   the   Luxembourg   bank   supervisory   authority   had   noted   some "questionable"   operations   with   a   US   IT   services   company.   On April   27,   2006,   the   Luxembourg   courts   handed a   nonsuit,   but   should   we   be   surprised   ?   Before   his   activity   by   CEDEL,   André   Lussi   had   worked   for   UBS in London. André   Lussi   "the   most   powerful   Swiss   banker   in   the   world"    according   to   Article   May   13,   2001 Swissinfo.ch   /   He   was   at   the   head   of   CLEARSTREAM,   one   of   the   most   mysterious   companies   of international finance, established in Luxembourg. (quoting the article) Accusations of « Revelation $  » (From Wikipedia - Clearstream Case 1) The charge of Denis Robert  and Ernest Backes  based on four points : • Companies   have   accounts   at   Clearstream,   and   these   accounts   were   used   to   make   illegal   money   transfers.   Cedel   International customers   then   those   of   Clearstream   may   request   that   their   accounts   be   published   or   not. According   Clearstream,   said   accounts "unpublished"   are   audited   and   subject   to   the   same   controls   as   the   said   "published"   accounts. At   least   one   illegal   transaction   has been demonstrated, the BCCI after judicial closure.  (Editor: BCCI was UBS partner) . • Cedel   International   and   Clearstream   would   hold   non-financial   corporate   and   individuals   accounts.   Many   international   groups   are also   financial   groups,   including   a   bank. According   Clearstream   customers   are   private   or   public   banks,   central   banks   or   financial institutions and four companies. • According   to   Régis   Hempel,   a   former   computer   scientist   Clearstream   Cedel-fired   in   1992,   data   have   been   erased   before   the investigations of the Luxembourg court. • Ernest   Backes   also   says   in   Revelation $    he   was   responsible   for   the   transfer   of   $   7   million   from   Chase   Manhattan   Bank   to   the Citibank,   on   January   16,   1980,   which   helped   to   pay   for   the   release   of   American   hostages   held   in   Tehran   embassy.   He   gave   a copy of the files at the National Assembly, and illuminating what Americans call the October Surprise. Ernest BACKES  was a founder of CEDEL International and was the Nr 3 de CLEARSTREAM. On   February   11,   2002,   he   asked   Joseph   FERRAYE   to   join   him   in   Luxembourg   to   give   him   lists   of   CLEARSTREAM   transcactions, indicating the origin of the funds and their final destination. The   next   day   at   the   Hotel   des   Vignes   in   Luxembourg,   in   the   interview   with   BACKES,   he   has   revealed   the   involvement   of   the   Trilateral Commission,   the   World   Government,   the   Bilderberg   group,   all   the   secret   societies   which   FERRAYE   had   never   heard   speak.   BACKES again confirmed at the meeting, he would give him the promised documents, the next day at home. On   February   13,   2002,   in   his   own   house,   BACKES   asked   FERRAYE   give   these   documents   to   Bernard   BERTOSSA.   Joseph   FERRAYE who   did   not   know   that   BACKES   and   BERTOSSA   knew,    had   the   bad   reflex   to   point   out   to   BACKES   it   was   unwise   to   hand   over documents in question to the Geneva prosecutor who was one of the main protagonists in the scam money . This   remark   upset   BACKES   who   thought   previously   receiving   benefifs   paid   by   FERRAYE   in   compensation   for   his   help.   BACKES   saw   a better   opportunity   therefore   choosing   to   go   along   with   BERTOSSA   instead   FERRAYE.   BACKES   who   wanted   to   get   his   share   of   the   loot has used its relationship with BERTOSSA to get it and FERRAYE could not do anything to receive the promised documents. In   March   2003 ,   BACKES    set   an   appointment   to   FERRAYÉ   at   the   Geneva   Airport   and   presented   him   André   STREBEL.   BACKES claimed   that   STREBEL   would   help   FERRAYÉ   to   restore   his   rights.   STREBEL   set   several   successive   appointments   to   FERRAYE   in   Nyon to   obtain   key   information   and   parallel   he   intervened   with   its   industrial   relations   (he   was   ssociate   with   BACKES   in   IWR   -   Institut   für Wirtschaftsrecherchen GmbH in Saarbrücken D) to remove documents from governments and swiss banks. In   fact,   the   role   of   STREBEL   was   to   clean   any   traffic   trace   where   FERRAYE   funds   had   passed,   as   well   as   where   compromising documents   exist.   To   achieve   this,   he   had   to   know   what   had   FERRAYE   as   documents   and   information.   It   is   then   the   STREBEL   demand, that the German television  ARD2 came record a program on FERRAYE in Geneva, which was broadcast in Germany. One   of   the   first   released   document   by   STREBEL   was   the   conclusive   evidence   of   the   involvement   of   the   President   of   CREDIT   SUISSE GROUP - Rainer E. GUT,   whose signature appears on the Signature card of EVERTON Enterprises Ltd.  in Road Town Tortola BVI. STREBEL   could   not   understand   that   the   President   of   CREDIT   SUISSE   Rainer   E.   GUT   could   combine   in   EVERTON   Ltd,   with   criminals who   normally   dealt   with   SBS   (ex   UBS)   ...   It's   finally   Francis   Mayoraz   in   Geneva,   who   saw   FERRAYE,   the   signature   card   which   included the Chairman of CREDIT SUISSE Rainer E. GUT. He then also obtained Form A  with the appropriate signatures at Credit Suisse. STREBEL   has   confirmed   to   FERRAYE   he   was   right   concerning   the   signing   of   Rainer   E.   GUT,   and   that   he   too,   has   obtained   the aforesaid document, but refused to forward. On   October   17,   2003,   STREBEL   has   convened   FERRAYE   in   St-Prex   VD   and   showed   him   15   centimeters   of   documents   which   he   had removed   the   headers   and   signatures.   He   asked   FERRAYE   to   read.   Joseph   FERRAYE   refused,   retorting   to   his   interlocutor   that   he   would not   be   interested   by   documents   without   identity,   that   anyone   could   make   and   he   was   willing   to   come   back   the   day   STREBEL   would submit him not tampered documents. During   this   interview,   STREBEL   asked   FERRAYE   to   note   the   name   of   the   lawyer   MEMBREZ   in   Geneva.    STREBEL   was   going   to   get   an appointment   with   BONNANT   and   WARLUZEL    in   the   days   that   followed   and   FERRAYE   was   going   to   cash   1   to   2   billion   dollars . STREBEL said, "you will not refuse them. You accept them. We take them and we réattaque". Sunday,   October   26,   2003,   STREBEL   informed   FERRAYE   that   he   had   an   appointment   with   BONNANT   and   BERTOSSA   to   14.00   H.   He set   an   appointment   to   FERRAYE   at   the   McDonald   in   Nyon   at   16.00   H.   STREBEL   only   arrived   at   18.30   and   confirmed   to   FERRAYE   he would receive $ 100 million. FERRAYE replied that he agreed and "We take them and we réattaque ! This   response,   which   yet   accurately   reflect   the   STREBEL   formulation   of   17   October   2003,   has   made   him   this   day   completely   berserk. He   stood   up   screaming   "it's   not   going   in   your   head   ?   what   would   you   do   with   more   than   100   million   ?   With   this   money   you   can   live,   you, your children and grandchildren, like royalty. You will receive $ 100 million net for you, that's a lot of money that you can not spend etc. ". On   October   27,   2003,   during   his   phone   call,   STREBEL   notified   FERRAYE   "if   you   do   not   do   what   I   tell   you,   I'll   kick   your   ass." Subsequently, during its contacts with STREBEL, FERRAYE did nothing but be insulted ! Yet   we   see   on   a   draft   letter   written   by   STREBEL    and   faxed   from   his   office   (IWR   -   Institut   für   Wirtschaftsrecherchen   GmbH),   to FERRAYE   on   10.10.2003,   that   he   attacked   the   magistrate   JUNOD.      We   must   then   so   deduce,   on   the   basis   of   the   points   above,   that   he only wanted to put pressure to get integrated into the plot and receive his part. On   December   12,   2003,   the   date   of   the   hearing   of   POSSA   -   BONVIN   and   BRUPPACHER   by   judge   JUNOD,   STREBEL   has   called FERRAYE who was absent and he left the message to her daughter to remind as soon as possible, it was very important. In   May   2002,   Me   LUDOT   French   lawyer,   told   FERRAYE   he   had   obtained   a   copy   of   the   Aix-en-Provence   procedure   about   Paul   Marc COLNE,   who   had   signed   the   backdated   agreement   with   ARAMCO   (tab   History   /   scammed   patents).   COLNE   were   murdered   in December 1997... On   December   13,   2003,   FERRAYE   recalled   STREBEL   who   announced   to   him   :   " You   do   not   know   what   I   have   done   for   you   yesterday   ?   I met   for   4   to   5   hours,   Paul   Marc   COLNE   [...]"    ...   FERRAYE   retorted   that   Paul   Marc   COLNE   was   assassinated   in   December   1997,   but STREBEL   insisted,   claiming   that   it   was   wrong,   he   was   with   him   the   day   before. According   STREBEL,   FERRAYE   was   wrong.   STREBEL then hung up by mentioning that he would call back the next day. On   December   14,   2003,   STREBEL   recalled   FERRAYE   and   confirmed   that   he   was   right,   Paul   Marc   COLNE   was   dead   in   1997   ...   but STREBEL   said   he   was   awaiting   a   decision   of   the   Court   of   Perpignan...   that   he   would   transmit   this   act   to   Juge   Christine   JUNOD   in Geneva   and   that   this   decision   would   enable   to   restore   all   its   rights   to   FERRAYE.   These   successive   telephone   conversations   were recorded In   fact,   STREBEL   had   misunderstood   his   accomplices   (BERTOSSA   -   BONNANT)   who   rode   a   new   plan.   Instead   of   mentioning   his meeting   with   Paul   Marc   COLNE,   STREBEL   should   have   said   that   he   was   waiting   the   decision   of   Tribunal   of   PERPIGNAN,   that   would confirm   posthumous   the   condemnation   of   COLNE,   who   had   signed   the   backdated   agreement.   The   STREBEL   confusion,   who   said   he spoke   for   4   to   5   hours   with   Paul   Marc   COLNE,   corresponded   in   fact,   at   the   time   where   POSSA   -   BONVIN   and   BRUPPACHER   hearings with STREBEL, who was attending to establish his false custom declarations... The   coincidence   of   the   STREBEL   call   of   12   December   2003,   the   day   of   the   hearing   of   the   three   protagonists,   can   not   be   a   coincidence, since   these   statements   ignore   any   involvement   of   living   accomplices,   but   with   the   decision   of   PERPIGNAN,   STREBEL   believed postpone charges on Paul Marc COLNE who is dead and can not protest ... These   facts   imply   once   again   the   Geneva   magistrate   Christine   JUNOD   who   made   protocol   of   hearing   dictated   by   STREBEL, according   to   the   BERTOSSA   plan.   This   also   complements   the   heads   of   accusations   against   the   three   auditioned   for   false testimony.   Remember   that   August   26,   2002,   Judge   JUNOD   had   confirmed   to   be   in   possession   of   bank   documents    in   the amount of USD 24.0 billion, pieces she had received from Daniel LEVAVALLEUR.

André Lüssi Photo Keystone