France
French Republic
This
is
a
vocabulary
that
corresponds
to
the
political
or
campaign
speeches, but has lost all meaning.
Freedom
The
definition
according
to
Larousse
is:
Condition
of
a
people
that is governed in full sovereignty.
What
remains
of
this
sovereignty,
while
the
people
themselves
manifest
to
prove
his
suffering,
frustration,
dissatisfaction,
and
counting
his
weariness
to
his
Government
and
that
it
feigned
to
hear and continued his abuse.
Équality
No discrimination between human beings, in terms of their rights. Political, civil and social equality.
A
state
in
which
the
law
is
applied
according
to
the
social
status
of
the
Citizen,
in
which
the
judiciary
violates
the
principles
of
law
and
its
application,
in
which
the
poorest
citizens
become
instruments
leaders
to
loot
public
money,
this
state
whose
privileges
are
restricted
to
the
ruling
class,
is
against
democracy.
It
is
an
oligarchy
or
in
more
serious
cases a dictatorship.
Fraternity
Bond
of
solidarity
that
should
unite
all
members
of
the
human
family.
A
link
between
persons
who
participate
in the same ideal.
Fraternity
in
a
Oligarchy
as
became
France,
does
not
exist
!
When
the
power
(left
and
right
confused)
sacrifices
middle
and
poor
classes,
to
allow
relatives
of
the
Government
and
the
captains
of
the
economy
who
finance
their
elections,
to
access
without
sharing
any
privileges
and
any
income
in
the
economy,
to
selfishly
enrich
themselves
at
the
expense
of
purchasing
power
of
the
people,
such
a
power
(Government
and
Parliament)
must
be
put
out
of
harm’s way.
Reflections
The
French
Constitution
of
4
October
1958
decreed
its
commitment
to
the
principles
of
human
rights
and
the
principles
of
national
sovereignty.
The
desire
to
have
new
institutions
founded
on
the
common
ideal
of
liberty,
equality
and fraternity, designed for their democratic evolution.
What
citizen
living
in
France
who
are
not
part
of
the
oligarchy
in
place
or
which
is
not
part
of
the
privileged
class,
can
make
the
connection
between
the
living
context
in
which
he
is
living
because
of
the
actions
of
his
government
and
rights guaranteed to citizens by the Constitution ?
Leaders
of
states
as
seen
more
in
the
tab
"state
without
law"
have
no
more
any
ethics,
no
morals,
no
respect
for
the
citizen.
Their
speeches
are
lies
and
deceptions.
When
Leaders
of
states
are
able
to
divert
citizen
profits,
royalties
of
patents
for
which
they
are
responsible,
when
they
are
able
to
violate
the
right
to
intellectual
property
protection,
for
their own profit, those members of governments must be brought to Justice !
When
this
"justice"
endorses
and
participates
in
the
crime
denounced,
then
there
is
machination
and
in
the
case
of
royalties FERRAYE, we must say that it is an organized gang fraud.
The
hearing
of
November
19,
2002
by
Mr.
Eric
DE
LA
HAYE--ST-HILAIRE,
parisian
Notary
serving
the
French
Government,
is
indicative
of
the
absence
of
the
rule
of
law
in
France.
He
refers
to
LE
MAZOU,
lawyer
specialized
in
the
field
of
intellectual
property.
He
notes
on
page
2,
he
refused
to
orchestrate
acts
in
France,
because
of
the
involvement
of
the
French
Petroleum
Institute,
“possible”
responsible
of
embezzlement
of
royalties
whose
Joseph
FERRAYE
was
the
victim.
It
is
the
reason
that
Mr.
DE
LA
HAYE--ST-HILAIRE
had
solicited
the
collaboration
of
Pierre
MOTTU,
Notary
in
Geneva.
Parisian
notary
further
confirms
the
existence
of
accounts
referenced
to
"other"
protagonists
of
this
case
and
that
a
criminal
Procédure
was
opened
in
France
against
former
partners
of
Joseph
FERRAYE.
Where
it
gets
interesting
is
that
Mr.
DE
LA
HAYE--ST-HILAIRE
and
Me
LE
MAZOU
reflected
in
a
legal
elaborate
scheme,
namely
a
act
of
cession
of
rights
contentious
of
Mr.
FERRAYE
to
a
third
entity
called
Wildrose
(WR
)
which
had
the
function
to
liaise
with
the
former
partners
of
Mr.
FERRAYE
to
find
a
compromise.
In
this
scheme
the
patent
holder
would
receive
a
percentage
of
the
amounts
recovered
by
WR
and
in
return
the
legal
proceedings
engaged by complaint of Joseph FERREYE in the south of France had to be classified.
Finally,
in
a
second
phase,
this
time
in
the
absence
of
Mr.
FERRAYE,
Mr.
Eric
DE
LA
HAYE-ST-HILAIRE
confirms
that
he
and
Pierre
MOTTU
had
accounts
statements
they
had
submitted
to
the
partners
and
agents
of
Joseph
FERRAYE
who
had
defrauded
the
royalties.
ST-HILAIRE
said
that
during
the
transactions,
the
amounts
(it
was
tens
of
billions
of
dollars)
remained
frozen
in
accounts
"whether
by
MOTTU
or
whether
by
lawyer
BRUPPACHER
in
Zurich
correspondent of LE MAZOU”.
To
finish
with
Me
Eric
DE
LA
HAYE-ST-HILAIRE,
you
should
know
that
at
the
hearing
of
June
25,
2007
(Trial
MOTTU
<>
BURDET
for
slander),
Mr.
ST-HILAIRE
testified
that
he
had
seen
copies
of
statements
of
accounts
of
100
billion
dollars
royalties
from
KUWAIT.
(These
100
billion
did
not
involve
the
sale
of
systems
at
the
French
Trade
Week
of
November 23 to 29, 1991 in Kuwait City.
Denatured States
The
aforementioned
hearing
of
notar
Eric
DE
LA
HAYE--ST-HILAIRE
shows
us
both
that
the
royalties
had
indeed
been
sequestered
and
they
were
on
the
accounts
of
Notary
Pierre
MOTTU
and
lawyer
Mark
C.
BRUPPACHER
in
Zurich.
associate
of
LE
MAZOU.
The
hearing
also
shows
us
that
the
French
"justice"
had
good
control
on
the
partners
and
agents
of
Joseph
FERRAYE
who
had
defrauded
the
royalties,
since
proceedings
were
open
in
the
south of France.
So
how
in
a
State
of
the
law,
can
we
set
up
a
"elaborated
scheme"
to
"to
dispose
of
rights
contentious"
for
those
who
had
defrauded
a
citizen
?
Does
not
the
law
foresee
that
the
author
of
a
fraud
must
be
condemned
and the booty recovered shall be returned to its owner ?
This
shows
us
clearly
and
with
certainty,
that
if
Mr.
Eric
DE
LA
HAYE-ST-HILAIRE
was
Notary
of
the
French
Government,
He
wanted
to
find
a
"more
elaborate
scheme"
to
subtract
the
CROOKS
in
prosecution
knowing
that
the
political
environment
was
watered
copiously
in
this
scam.
Daniel
LEVAVASSEUR
member
of
the
RPR
and
former
agent
of
the
DST
who
had
found
accounts
on
which
royalties
were
transfered,
had
told
Joseph
FERRAYE
that
his
intention
was
to
resolve
the
problem
without
the
politicians
are
affected.
You
should
know
that
after
the
sale
of
systems to all oil producing countries, the royalties were calculated in trillions of dollars (at the time).
Place to the VI
e
Républic
On
October
18,
2006,
Joseph
FERRAYE
filed
a
criminal
complaint
with
the
Tribunal
de
Grande
Instance
of
Nanterre,
complaint
registered
under
number
N
06
291
0047
with
stamp
of
prosecutor
of
the
Republic...
Nearly
10
years
after
the
filing
of
the
complaint
which
included
a
memory
of
200
pages
and
177
evidence
of
the
crimes
committed,
no
action
has
ever
been
given.
The
responsibility
of
France
in
this
procedure,
is
calculated in tens of billions of Euros!
Confidence
in
the
French
political
authorities
can
never
be
restored.
The
proof
is
given
that
the
French
authorities
-
Left
and
Right
together
-
are
able
to
defraud
and
appropriating
the
property
of
others,
on
which
they
have
no
right,
to
their
personal
interests.
One
must
then
ask
the
question
of
what
they
will
do
with
the
retirement
assets
they
control,
with
contributions
to
the
health,
with
saving
money
on
bank
accounts,
usw.,
knowing
that
the
banks
were
financial
instruments
that
allowed
this
fraud,
cautioned
by
the
State.
It
is
the
banks
that
manage
these
huge
capitals
that
allowed
holders
who
have
cheated,
to
take
control
of
the
economy.
No
Law
in
the
current
legislation
does
refer
to
fraud
or
crimes
made
by
the
Magistrates
or
other
holders
of
the
Judiciary
and
how
they
would
be
condamned.
That
is
maybe
why
they
can
continue
their
crimes
with
total impunity.
When
he
has
the
power
to
condemn
crimes,
whoever
practices
crimes
should
be
pursued
subject
sentence
10
times
more
the
average
citizen.
New
legal
bases
must
be
in
place,
because
the
Constitution
did
not
provide
for
such
villainys.
It
is
sure
that
at
the
time
of
General
DE
GAULLE,
such
contempt
of
the
people
was
unthinkable.
It's time to make room for the VI
e
Republic